Apple's updated Mac Studio with M2 Max and M2 Ultra chips will launch in stores and begin arriving to customers this Tuesday. Ahead of time, the first reviews of the desktop computer have been shared by select media outlets and YouTube channels.

Mac Studio Desk
The new Mac Studio features the same overall design as the 2022 model, but now features Apple's latest M2 Max and M2 Ultra chips, faster Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity, and support for high-impedance headphones. Pricing remains unchanged, with the M2 Max model starting at $1,999 and the M2 Ultra model starting at $3,999.

Apple has also updated the Mac Studio with an HDMI 2.1 port, enabling 8K external display support. Other ports remain unchanged.

Benchmarks

As expected, the M2 Ultra chip is a doubled-up M2 Max chip. It features a 24-core CPU, up to a 76-core GPU, a 32-core Neural Engine, and support for up to 192GB of unified memory. Apple says the M2 Ultra has a 20% faster CPU than the M1 Ultra, as confirmed by Geekbench 6 benchmark results that have already surfaced.

Jason Snell shared a wider set of benchmark results in his Mac Studio review at Six Colors:
M2 Ultra Mac Studio benchmarks

Written Reviews

PCMag's Joe Osborne explained the Mac Studio's expanded display support:

All of this helps widen the breadth of display support for the Mac Studio using M2 Ultra, increasing the maximum number of displays that can be connected at one time from five to eight—all at 4K resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate over DisplayPort via Thunderbolt 4. If you bring the display count down to six, then the panels can go up to 6K resolution at 60Hz. If you halve the connected displays from there, to three, they can all output up to 8K resolution at 60Hz.

If you need a faster refresh rate, you’ll need to use the included HDMI port, which can support up to 240Hz at 4K resolution. This connection also supports variable refresh rate, HDR, and multichannel audio.

Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham said the Mac Studio remains silent:

I liked the Mac Studio a lot last year, and I still like it a lot. It performs well, it's dead silent, it will fit just about anywhere, and it's the rare Apple computer to put ports on the front, where they can actually be accessed. If you're eyeing an upgrade from an Intel Mac, the M2 Max version is a great step (at least performance-wise) for anyone used to a 27-inch iMac's performance level. The M2 Ultra can run circles around the Intel Mac Pro and should perfectly match the Apple Silicon Mac Pro, as it uses the same chip.

Engadget's Devindra Hardawar said the Mac Studio is the "ideal machine" for power users:

That leaves the $1,999 Mac Studio as the ideal machine for Apple power users. It'll be enough for video editing work, and it also comes standard with 32GB of RAM (it could use more than 512GB of storage, though). Step up to the $3,999 model with an M2 Ultra chip, and you've got a system that can destroy just about any task you put in front of it. The few professional users who need PCIe expansion can now opt for the M2 Ultra-equipped Mac Pro, which starts at an eye-watering $6,999.

More reviews were shared by CNET, TechCrunch, Macworld, and others.

Video Reviews





Related Roundup: Mac Studio
Buyer's Guide: Mac Studio (Don't Buy)
Related Forum: Mac Studio

Top Rated Comments

fbr$ Avatar
15 months ago
Weird that a Mac mini M2 Pro 12cpu/19gpu 32GB/512GB is more expensive than the base Mac Studio M2 Max 12cpu/30gpu with same RAM and SSD as the mini, which just proves Apple charges too much on upgrades.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
15 months ago
tl;dr - a computer that was already a pretty solid choice for many of the more demanding tasks one could do in macOS is now even more so. :p
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JitteryJimmy Avatar
15 months ago

Mac Studio as the ideal machine for Apple power users. It'll be enough for video editing work, and it also comes standard with 32GB of RAM (it could use more than 512GB of storage, though).
I find it somewhat humorous that some writers see the default 512GB of on-board storage as unreasonable for pro-class users. We have always attached our editing stations to our SAN. We haven't had big drives on our Pros for well over a decade. Local storage is basically for the OS, virtual memory, and cache, and all the big stuff is on our big iron so it can be easily shared, managed, and backed up. Not everyone is a home user making YouTube videos in their garage.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NY Guitarist Avatar
15 months ago
I would be first in line for the M2 Mac Studio if I didn't already have a Mac Studio M1 Ultra that is so powerful that I feel no desire to upgrade.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheYayAreaLiving ?️ Avatar
15 months ago
M2 Mac Studio (2023) in action! ?



Attachment Image

Attachment Image

Attachment Image

Attachment Image
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
name99 Avatar
15 months ago

Interesting (surprising?) that despite an updated chip, the improvement in performance between the original M1 Max and the updated M2 Max and M2 Ultra chips seems to be merely equal to or less than relative increase in the number of processing cores. On a per-core basis it doesn't look like the M2 chips are significantly faster than the M1 chips.
(a) Are you talking about CPU or GPU?

(b) For CPU we knew that going in! The A15 is essentially the same IPC as the A14. And was designed as such; it was designed to be basically the same design as the A14 but everything optimized for significantly lower power while still achieving slightly higher frequency on the same process. This was valuable (battery life on A15 phones is noticeably longer) and part of the plan.
(There are a few very specific tweaks in A15 that help some specialized code, most notably javascript in Safari; but they are very specific.)

Same transfers to M2. It's basically M1 IPC, but a slightly boosted frequency.

None of this is catastrophic or an indication that Apple is running out of steam. The A15 should have been just an energy-saving tick to be followed by a performing-enhancing tock. It's quit possible that it was never supposed to even be in the M2; the next core would have done that job. But as I keep saying, covid screwed up the timelines and Apple was forced to scramble with what was available.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Less Than Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Thursday July 25, 2024 5:43 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
Apple Intelligence General Feature

Apple Intelligence Now Available in New iOS 18.1, iPadOS 18.1, and macOS Sequoia Developer Betas

Monday July 29, 2024 10:07 am PDT by
Apple is today providing developers with the first betas of iOS 18.1, iPadOS 18.1, and macOS Sequoia 15.1, with the new software introducing an early version of the Apple Intelligence features. These new betas will be in testing alongside the current iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia 15 betas. Developers can choose whether to opt into the new betas with Apple Intelligence, or stay on the ...
Apple Intelligence General Feature

Report: Apple Intelligence Delayed to iOS 18.1 in October

Sunday July 28, 2024 11:52 am PDT by
Apple Intelligence will miss its initial expected launch date to give Apple more time to fix bugs, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports. According to individuals with knowledge about Apple's plans, the company now plans to start rolling out Apple Intelligence in software updates by October, arriving several weeks after the launch of iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia. This means that Apple...
T Mobile Generic Feature Pink 1

T-Mobile Sued for Breaking Lifetime Price Guarantees

Friday July 26, 2024 2:44 pm PDT by
T-Mobile customers have filed a lawsuit [PDF] against the carrier, alleging that it failed to honor a guarantee not to raise the prices of select cellular plans. The lawsuit, first spotted by Wired, claims that back in 2017, T-Mobile advertised several of its plans with a price lock, but then went on to increase prices starting in May 2024. "T-Mobile ONE customers keep their price until...